Outline and assess Foucault's critique of modernity Essay

Outline and assess Foucaults critique of forward-lookingity - Essay exampleIt shall present Foucaults ideas according to post-modernism and how it conflicts with the ideas of modernity. Then it shall seek to provide an answer to the questions raised in this introduction. A conclusion to this paper shall provide a summary and a clear answer to the issues raised. Foucault critiques of modernity be based on the anti- paradise principles which do not agree with the act of matching reason with emancipation and progress. Instead, Foucault argues that the associate between modern realms of information has led to different types of domination (Kellner, 1991 65). His reports have added details to this domination finished psychiatry, medicine, and criminology. His aim was to critique the trends in the current world order which makes issues from the more contemporary forms of prudence which step to the fore to be natural, but are actually oppressive forms of domination. From his goals, it can be deduced that Foucault is a complex and eclectic thinker who draws from multiple sources and problematic while aligning himself with no single one (Kellner, 1991 41). Foucaults literature and philosophy is a critique of modernity and he differentiates between the classical and the modern eras of the post-Renaissance period (Kellner, 1991 39). He sees the classical era as inaugurating a powerful mode of domination over human beings that culminates in the modern era (Kellner, 1991 41). He also digests Nietzsche when the latter does not give much credit to the understanding ideals in historical progress. In effect, Foucault believes that humans do not go through a serial publication of conflicts to eventually arrive at an implied agreement of the rule of law instead, he believes that humans use the series of violent acts under certain rules and then they progress from one act of domination to another (Foucault, 1979 25). Enlightenment was deemed by Foucault as a means of in creasing political power and of distributing it in the social cranial orbit eventually covering different aspects of daily life. Foucault, in effect, supports a position against modernity and this is a major characterization of his work (Grumley, Hegel, and Foucault, 1989 11). The postmodern ideal does not support the idea of equating reason and emancipation with each other and it also does not support the attempts at making issues out of the different modern and oppressive elements of rationality. Foucault sees modern rationality and subjectivity therefore as a source of domination (Grumley, Hegel, and Foucault, 1989 p. 171). He also points out that knowledge and truth are tools for power and domination. Critique of Foucaults perspectives One of the critiques of Foucaults perspective of modernity is the fact that he rejected the advantages which were gained through modernity, including that of medicine (Kellner, 1991 65). Other philosophers like Habermas believed that acquisit ion and the technologies arising from it would not create any issues for as long as these technologies are managed according to proper rules (Powell and Moody, 2003). In contrast, Foucault completely discounted the benefits and progressive gains from modernity and science. Foucault believed that modernity is entirely disciplinary, and this generalization is a difficult one to support (Koopman, 2010 3). His analysis has not exactly focused on what would end up being right in the end